User Tools

Site Tools


blog:pushbx:2024:1111_early_november_work

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

blog:pushbx:2024:1111_early_november_work [2024-11-11 18:04:25 +0100 Nov Mon]
ecm created
blog:pushbx:2024:1111_early_november_work [2024-11-11 19:03:21 +0100 Nov Mon] (current)
ecm [(Free)DOS Debug accepts ''mov cx, al'' instruction]
Line 29: Line 29:
 I did wonder whether the application is properly credited in DOSBox-X. Its source tree contains a file named CREDITS.md but the only relevant entry is "FreeDOS utilities as binary blobs (FreeDOS; no license)". Turns out [[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79171410/how-to-print-a-symbol-for-a-user-provided-number-of-times-in-dos-assembly-x86#comment139607446_79171410|for the original DOS Debug branch this is probably fine]]. Maybe not so much for other FreeDOS applications included there. I did wonder whether the application is properly credited in DOSBox-X. Its source tree contains a file named CREDITS.md but the only relevant entry is "FreeDOS utilities as binary blobs (FreeDOS; no license)". Turns out [[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79171410/how-to-print-a-symbol-for-a-user-provided-number-of-times-in-dos-assembly-x86#comment139607446_79171410|for the original DOS Debug branch this is probably fine]]. Maybe not so much for other FreeDOS applications included there.
  
-Eventually I confirmed that the most recent release of DOS Debug/X still accepts the incorrect ''mov cx, al'' instruction.+Eventually I confirmed that the most recent release of DOS Debug/X still accepts the incorrect ''mov cx, al'' instruction. (**ETA**: I [[https://github.com/Baron-von-Riedesel/DOS-debug/issues/19|reported the bug to the DOS Debug/X repo]].)
  
  
blog/pushbx/2024/1111_early_november_work.txt ยท Last modified: 2024-11-11 19:03:21 +0100 Nov Mon by ecm